Does Birth Order Determine Success?

Osiris

Servant of the Peace
Joined
Jan 23, 2005
Messages
248
Location
Maryland
Does Birth Order Determine Success?
proxy.php

By Kate Lorenz, CareerBuilder.com Editor
proxy.php

All men may be created equal; but a look at their pay stubs will tell you that their incomes are not. Blame it on social class, education -- even luck, but according to Dalton Conley, New York University professor of sociology and public policy, inequality begins at home.

In his book "The Pecking Order: Which Siblings Succeed and Why," Conley says that 75 percent of the income inequality between individuals in the United States occurs between siblings in the same families. He points to the diverse fortunes of Bill and Roger Clinton, and Jimmy and Billy Carter as examples.

Research shows that first borns (and onlys) lead the pack in terms of educational attainment, occupational prestige, income and net worth. Conversely middle children in large families tend to fare the worst. (Marcia! Marcia! Marcia!)

"A child's position in the family impacts his personality, his behavior, his learning and ultimately his earning power," states Michael Grose, author of "Why First Born Rule the World and Last-borns Want to Change It." "Most people have an intuitive knowledge that birth order somehow has an impact on development, but they underestimate how far-reaching and just how significant that impact really is."

Conley concedes that birth order is significant in shaping individual success, but only for children of large families -- four or more siblings -- and in families where finances and parental time are constrained. (In wealthy families, like the Bushes and Kennedys, it has less effect.)

Here's a look at what impact your birth-order may have on you:

First Borns:
More conscientious, ambitious and aggressive than their younger siblings, first borns are over-represented at Harvard and Yale as well as disciplines requiring higher education such as medicine, engineering or law. Every astronaut to go into space has been either the oldest child in his or her family or the eldest boy. And throughout history -- even when large families were the norm -- more than half of all Nobel Prize winners and U.S. presidents have been first born. Famous eldest children include: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, J.K. Rowling and Winston Churchill. And macho movie stars are First Born, too, including Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and all the actors who have played James Bond.

Middles:
Middle children are more easy going and peer-oriented. Since they can get lost in the shuffle of their own families, they learn to build bridges to other sources of support and therefore tend to have excellent people skills. Middle children often take on the role of mediator and peacemaker. Famous middle children include: Bill Gates, J.F.K., Madonna and Princess Diana.

Youngest:
The youngest child tends to be the most creative and can be very charming -- even manipulative. Because they often identify with the underdog, they tend to champion egalitarian causes. (Youngest siblings were the earliest backers of the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment.) Successful in journalism, advertising, sales and the arts, famous youngest children include Cameron Diaz, Jim Carrey, Drew Carey, Rosie O'Donnell, Eddie Murphy and Billy Crystal.

Only Children:
Only children have similar characteristics to first borns and are frequently burdened with high parental expectations. Research shows they are more confident, articulate and likely to use their imagination than other children. They also expect a lot from others, hate criticism, can be inflexible and are likely to be perfectionists. Well-known only children include Rudy Guiliani, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Alan Greenspan, Tiger Woods, tennis' teen queen Maria Sharapova and Leonardo Da Vinci.

Twins:
Because they hold equal status and are treated so similarly, twins turn out similarly in most cases. Consider advice columnists "Dear Abby" and "Ann Landers" (Abigail and Esther Friedman), and Harold and Bernard Shapiro, who became presidents of Princeton University and Canada's McGill University respectively.

Dr. Frank Sulloway, a behavioral scientist and visiting professor at the Institute of Personality and Social Research at University of California, Berkeley and author of the book, "Born To Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics and Creative Lives," says first borns are more similar in personality to first borns in other families than they are to their own younger siblings and that youngest children are often more similar to the youngest child in another family than his or her own elder siblings. He says this is because the family is not as much a "shared environment" as a set of niches that provide siblings with different outlooks.

Conley agrees, but stresses that these are just general trends -- and that the whole birth-order theory can be turned on its head depending on the child's personality, the age gap between siblings and the family circumstances each child experiences during his or her formative years.


Kate Lorenz is the article and advice editor for CareerBuilder.com. She researches and writes about job search strategy, career management, hiring trends and workplace issues.
proxy.php
 
Karma
Karma
nice topic of discussion. something that EVERYONE on the board can participate in and without any obvious religious slant! lol
Very fascinating article you found Osiris. I have to agree with this article though. I have an older brother but we're related through our mother. We have different fathers so I believe we're half siblings. But he's even years older so I'm considered "the baby" of the family. He's my only sibling.

Which makes me the youngest of the two of us.

Youngest:
The youngest child tends to be the most creative and can be very charming -- even manipulative. Because they often identify with the underdog, they tend to champion egalitarian causes. (Youngest siblings were the earliest backers of the Protestant Reformation and the Enlightenment.) Successful in journalism, advertising, sales and the arts, famous youngest children include Cameron Diaz, Jim Carrey, Drew Carey, Rosie O'Donnell, Eddie Murphy and Billy Crystal.


I can't believe how true it is, I did overcome many obstacles through my childhood including school and other aspects. And I proved them wrong, which makes me an underdog. Any of the descriptions above fit me.

Which would you be Osiris?
 
Im actually a only child/firstborn....for most of my life(childhood) I was an only child and raised as such until about my teens, when I got the first of my siblings, but I never lived with any of my siblings, so I think Im some sort of hybrid. Either way, I fit both descriptions very well, which is why I had to post this article.
 
This certainly works for me:
First Borns:
More conscientious, ambitious and aggressive than their younger siblings, first borns are over-represented at Harvard and Yale as well as disciplines requiring higher education such as medicine, engineering or law. Every astronaut to go into space has been either the oldest child in his or her family or the eldest boy. And throughout history -- even when large families were the norm -- more than half of all Nobel Prize winners and U.S. presidents have been first born. Famous eldest children include: Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, Richard Branson, J.K. Rowling and Winston Churchill. And macho movie stars are First Born, too, including Clint Eastwood, John Wayne, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis and all the actors who have played James Bond.

I'm the oldest child in my family, and am certainly treated very different to all younger siblings, not just in terms of age gap, but in attitude. I've always been the more ambitious one of the two of us, and I'm the one that was expected to do best in school. I wouldn't say I was more aggressive, though; I'm certainly not that kind of person.
 
Great thread. I am an only child, and everything clicks now. I often thought that my parents had and have high expectations from me which is a burden, really. Ironically, this doesn't stop me being confident but I hate criticism especially if it is done for the greater good. Guess I expect a lot from others . I am perfectionist and can lose sleeps, guess high expectations stick. Imagination is my label in family and in circle of friends. As well for being articulate, well, it depends on where I am, with whom and etc, but mainy, it is true that I express myself mostly and very much so.
 
I am an only child as well, the daughter of two doctors and so the expectation for me to do well was high. I think "only children" or the "oldest of a group of siblings" have certain advantages but the expectation of them to do well is ALSO going to be very high. i was always the oldest or among the "oldest" of any group i ran with from child hood and its only been in RECENT years that i've found myself more and more in the company of some who are even a little older than me..but even then, its not an issue.



I was raised with the attitude that i can do anything and that i should STRIVE for excellence. I'm not a BRAINIAC but i'm decently intelligent, articulate, worldly and have a little bit of what they call "life experience" behind me now lol and i was an honor student in highschool, a 3.2 gpa student in college and i've had a healthy social life from early child hood on up. I'm VERY outgoing and can easily assume the "leader" role in a group setting that I'm involved in...sometimes without even realizing it....and i know thats a trait of "first borns" as well.

as for the first born always getting the "highest pay" or whatever.. THAT is not always true...among my mother and her two sisters...my mother is the BABY and SHE is the highest paid (being that she's a doctor) and my. my OLDEST aunt was the second highest paid of the threeand has already retired from her position because her HUSBAND brings in a hefty amount of income as well, while my other aunt (the middle sister) never finished college but made the biggest production about it like she was all that for going to school and getting a job at a law firm while my mother and their OLDEST sister quietly went to college and grad school. so there's ONE example that "oldest" or "first born" doesnt always equal MOST SUCCESS.

another PRIME example that "birth order" not being a stone set determiner for success: MADONNA. She's the second oldest of 10 children and easily the most famous and affluent of her siblings.
 
I grew up the youngest, but my dad and mother just had a baby girl so now I'm in the middle. Let just say I was extremely rebellious. It was basically to get attention, but I agree with the younger children being more open to new ideas then the rest. I'm the only liberal in my family. I think I have some middle child in me too. I'm pretty social... I like to have people around. I think now that Lanna has been born I've calmed down quite a bit since my earlier years. It's weird though... I grew up the youngest and even exibited younger child traits, but now that I'm older I'm becoming more the middle child. You would think my traits would stay more in the youngest catagory.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top